Sunday, February 7, 2010

If only ignorance were a disease.

I would hope that a cure can be found.

I definitely get cranky when I see legislation that prevents same-sex couples from the same level of civil rights as married couples have. 

Yes, I said Civil Rights.

I do believe that same-sex marriage is a civil rights matter, and here's why:
  • Marriage is not a predominately religious institution.  Judges, lawyers, justices of the peace and even city/town officials can "officiate" a marriage. 
  • The status of "marriage" as a civil institution, affords benefits in:
    • health care
    • end of life decisions
    • tax benefits
    • financial benefits (applying for a mortgage, car loan, etc)
    • custody disputes
    • transfer of property
  • Marriage licenses are issued by the state, not by churches, religious bodies or clergy.
  • Marriage versus Civil Union is one of semantics.  If we are to separate the two, I recommend "Marriage" for those unions performed by clergy and completed in a church/temple/mosque/house of worshiop.  Civil Union for all other partnerships.
Just as I believe in the separation of church and state, I believe in the rights of same-sex marriages.  As marriage licenses are issued by the state, it is a civil matter, thus not one for debate in the religious community.

No comments: